Vix And Fed Rate Decision Announcments

Since today is Fed day, i thought id take a look at how rate decisions have affected Vix. Vix data starts from early 90’s so we’ll have start from there.

import quandl
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
import datetime as dt
from pandas.tseries.offsets import *

sns.set(style="whitegrid")
%matplotlib inline

fed = pd.read_csv("fed_dates.csv", index_col="Date")
fed.index = pd.to_datetime(fed.index, format="%m/%d/%Y")
fed["Rate"] = fed["Rate"].apply(lambda x: x[:-1])

vix = quandl.get("YAHOO/INDEX_VIX", authtoken="YOUR_TOKEN_HERE")
vix["pct"] = np.log(vix["Close"]).diff()

Setting up the rate decision dates

fed_raised = fed[fed["Rate"] > fed["Rate"].shift(1)]
fed_lowered = fed[fed["Rate"] < fed["Rate"].shift(1)]
fed_unch = fed[fed["Rate"] == fed["Rate"].shift(1)]

Eyeballing all rate decisions since early 90’s along with Vix.
Clicking on the plot, summons you a bigger version.

sdate = vix.index[1] # When vix data starts

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(21, 11))

plt.plot(vix["Close"], linewidth=1, color="#555555", label="Vix (Log scale)")
plt.vlines(fed_raised.loc[sdate:].index, 8, 89, color="crimson", alpha=0.34, label="Rates raised")
plt.vlines(fed_lowered.loc[sdate:].index, 8, 89, color="forestgreen", alpha=0.34, label="Rates lowered")
plt.vlines(fed_unch.loc[sdate:].index, 8, 89, color="k", alpha=0.11, label="Rates unchanged")

plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.title("Vix vs Fed funds rate decisions")
plt.margins(0.02)
plt.legend(loc="upper left", facecolor="w", framealpha=1, frameon=True)

Unknown-3.png

The sample size is small, nevertheless lets look at how Vix has behaved in rate increases, decreases and when rates have unchanged

def get_rets(dates):
days_before = 10+1
days_after = 64+1
out_instances = pd.DataFrame()

for index, row in dates.iterrows():
start_date = index - BDay(days_before)
end_date = index + BDay(days_after)

out = vix["pct"].loc[start_date: end_date]
out.reset_index(inplace=True, drop=True)
out = out.fillna(0)
out_instances[index] = out

out_instances.ix[-1] = 0 # Starting from 0 pct
out_instances.sort_index(inplace=True)
out_instances.reset_index(inplace=True)
out_instances.drop("index", axis=1, inplace=True)
return out_instances

inst_raised = get_rets(fed_raised.loc[sdate:])
inst_lowered = get_rets(fed_lowered.loc[sdate:])
inst_unch = get_rets(fed_unch.loc[sdate:])

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(21, 8))

plt.plot(inst_raised.mean(axis=1).cumsum(), color="crimson", label="Rates raised")
plt.plot(inst_lowered.mean(axis=1).cumsum(), color="forestgreen", label="Rates lowered")
plt.plot(inst_unch.mean(axis=1).cumsum(), color="#555555", label="Rates unchanged")
plt.axvline(13, color="crimson", linestyle="--", alpha=1, label="Fed rate announcement date")
plt.axhline(0, color="#555555", linestyle="--", alpha=0.34, label="_no_label_")
plt.title("Vix mean returns after Fed rate decisions")
plt.ylabel("Vix cumulative pct change")
plt.xlabel("Days...")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.legend(loc="upper left", facecolor="w", framealpha=1, frameon=True)

Unknown-2

Thanks your time and feel free to leave a comment

AAII Sentiment At New Spx 21 Week Highs

Nothing quantitative here, just taking a look at how the AAII setiment has been when Spx is making new 21 week rolling highs. The recent AAII setiment has turned siginificantly negative even as Spx is plowing up and wanted to see when has that happened in the past.

import quandl
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns

%matplotlib inline
sns.set(style="whitegrid")

aaii = quandl.get("AAII/AAII_SENTIMENT", authtoken="YOUR_KEY")
aaii.rename(columns={"S&P 500 Weekly High":"weekly_close"}, inplace=True)
weekly_max = aaii["weekly_close"].rolling(21).max()


fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(16, 10), sharex=True)

ax1.set_title("AAII sentiment at Spx rolling 21 week highs")
ax1.plot(aaii["weekly_close"], color="#555555", label="_no_label_")
ax1.fill_between(aaii.index, 0, aaii["weekly_close"],
where=((bull_mean>=0) & (weekly_max == aaii["weekly_close"])),
color="forestgreen", alpha=0.34, label="Bullish sentiment dominant")
ax1.fill_between(aaii.index, 0, aaii["weekly_close"],
where=((bear_mean>=0) & (weekly_max == aaii["weekly_close"])),
color="crimson", alpha=0.96, label="Bearish sentiment dominant")
ax1.grid(alpha=0.21)
ax1.set_yscale("log")
ax1.legend(loc="upper left")

ax2.set_title("Normalized AAII setiment")
ax2.plot(bull_mean, linewidth=1, color="darkseagreen", label="Bullish")
ax2.plot(bear_mean, linewidth=1, color="crimson", label="Bearish")
ax2.grid(alpha=0.21)
ax2.legend(loc="upper left")
plt.margins(0.02)
fig.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.089)

Unknown-1

Spx 1% low volatility range streaks

Spx is on a low volatility streak, taking a look at how long the streaks usually last and how the current streak relates to past instances. Also looking at Spx returns once the spell breaks – as do probably most others, i expected volatility to pick up, that does not seem to be the case. Bill Luby of Vix And More had a recent post supporting the case for low volatility feeding low volatility on a more long term basis. I myself look at a shorter timeframe but its good to keep longer timeframe in mind and not get overly carried away whenever Vix is asleep.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import datetime as dt

spy = get_pricing(symbols("SPY"), fields=["close_price", "high", "low"],
start_date=pd.Timestamp("2002-01-01"), end_date=dt.date.today())

spy = pd.DataFrame(spy, index=spy.index)
spy.rename(columns={"close_price" : "close"}, inplace=True)
spy.drop(["high", "low"], inplace=True, axis=1)
spy.dropna(inplace=True)

def rets(values, shift):
ret = (values.shift(-shift) / values) - 1
return ret

spy["pct"] = spy["close"].pct_change()

spy.dropna(inplace=True)

Last time Spx had a daily move of +/-1% or greater was on 7th of december

spy[abs(spy["pct"]) >= 0.01].iloc[-1]

screen-shot-2017-02-21-at-11-06-54

Lets look at the previous low volatility streaks. Setting up the streak instances count and index

spy_reset = spy.copy().reset_index()
instances = []

start_index = [0]
end_index = [0]
for index, row in spy_reset.iterrows():
abs_ret = abs(row["pct"])

if abs_ret > 0.01:
start_index.append(0)

if abs_ret <= 0.01:
end_index.append(start_index[-1])

if abs_ret <= 0.01 and abs(spy_reset["pct"]).iloc[index-1] > 0.01:
start_index.append(index)

instances.append([start_index[-1], row["pct"]])

instances_df = pd.DataFrame(instances)
instances_df.columns = ["inst", "pct"]
instances_df = instances_df[instances_df["inst"] != 0]

Looking at all the streak instances, where Spx daily pct moves have been below 1%, this includes moves both up and down. The current streak is nearing previous record (data starts from 2002). In absolute return terms, its rather close to the previous record and the wall of worry seems to have a consistent return angle across all long low volatility streaks

current_run = instances_df.groupby(["inst"]).get_group(3760)
current_run.loc[-1] = [0, 0]
current_run.index = current_run.index + 1
current_run = current_run.sort()
current_run.reset_index(inplace=True)

for index, group in instances_df.groupby(["inst"]):
if len(group) > 10:
group.loc[-1] = [0, 0]
group.index = group.index +1
group = group.sort()
group.reset_index(inplace=True)
plt.plot(group["pct"].cumsum(), color="#555555", alpha=0.42, linewidth=1, label="_nolegend_")

plt.plot(current_run["pct"].cumsum(), color="crimson", label="Current streak (Start, Dec 12 2016)")
plt.title("Spy low volatility streaks (+/-1%) of longer than 10 days", fontsize=11)
plt.xlabel("# Of trading days in low vol streak")
plt.ylabel("Streak return")
plt.legend(loc="center right")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)

unknown

Now that the streaks are defined, one can look at the corresponding Spx 3 month forward returns when the spell breaks and Spx gets a move of more than 1% up or down. I included only performance fo streaks lasting longer than 21 days. I was expecting to see volatility pick up

returns_df = spy.copy().reset_index()
returns_df["streak"] = np.array(instances)[:, 0]

returns_n = pd.DataFrame(index=np.arange(0, 100))

for index_g, group in returns_df.groupby(["streak"]):
if len(group) > 21:
index_g = int(group.index[-1])
out = returns_df.iloc[index_g:index_g+64]
out = out.reset_index(drop=True)
#plt.plot(out["pct"].cumsum())
returns_n[index_g] = out["pct"].cumsum()

returns_n.loc[-1, returns_n.columns.values] = 0
returns_n.sort_index(inplace=True)
returns_n.reset_index(drop=True, inplace=True)
returns_n.dropna(how="all", inplace=True)

plt.plot(returns_n, color="#555555", alpha=0.42, linewidth=1, label="_nolegend_")
plt.plot(returns_n.mean(axis=1), color="crimson", label="Mean rets")
plt.title("Spy returns after a break of low volatility streak (+/-1%) of longer than 21 days", fontsize=11)
plt.yticks(np.arange(-0.15, 0.10, 0.02))
plt.xlim(0, 63)
plt.xlabel("# Of trading days after low vol streak ends")
plt.ylabel("Post streak return")
plt.legend(loc="upper left")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)

unknown

Thanks your time and feel free to leave a comment

Vix Term Structure Lows and Vix returns N Days Later

As of yesterday (25’th january 2017) Vix Term Structure (1mo/3mo implied vol) closed at 0.794. Taking a quick look at what low Vix Ts values have meant for Vix returns going forward and run a bare bones backtest to gauge the initial validity of low Ts as a signal

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from quantopian.interactive.data.quandl import cboe_vix, cboe_vxv
from odo import odo
import datetime
import pyfolio as pf

xiv = get_pricing(symbols("XIV"), fields="close_price",
    start_date=datetime.date(2011,1,1),
    end_date=datetime.date(2017,1,25))

dfvix = odo(cboe_vix, pd.DataFrame)
dfvix = dfvix.set_index(dfvix["asof_date"])
dfvxv = odo(cboe_vxv, pd.DataFrame)
dfvxv = dfvxv.set_index(dfvxv["asof_date"])

df = pd.concat([dfvix, dfvxv], axis=1, join_axes=[dfvix.index])
df.sort(inplace=True)
df = df.rename(columns={"close":"vxv_close"})
df = df[["vix_close", "vxv_close"]]
df["vix_ts"] = df["vix_close"] / df["vxv_close"]

First looking at just the overall distribution of absolute Vix Ts values, readings below .8 are rare. Data starts from 2008

ecd = np.arange(1, len(df)+1, dtype=float) / len(df)

plt.figure(figsize=(10, 10))
plt.plot(np.sort(df["vix_ts"]), ecd, linewidth=1, color="#555555")
plt.axvline(0.794, linestyle="--", color="crimson", linewidth=1)
plt.xlabel("Vix Ts values")
plt.ylabel("Percent of Vix Ts values that are smaller than corresponding x")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)

unknown-1

Rather than using an absolute Vix Ts threshold as a signal or gauge to determine how low is low, i tried to use a rolling min value, meaning making the Vix Ts value relative. The threshold is simply defined as Ts – Rolling21 Min of Ts. Took two months as the trail amount, since it seems a significant enough time for Ts to make new lows

df["min_ratio"] = df["vix_ts"] - df["vix_ts"].rolling(42).min()
df.dropna(inplace=True)

def formatPlot(x, where):
    x.grid(alpha=0.21)
    x.legend(loc=where)

fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(2, sharex=True, figsize=(16, 10))
ax1.plot(df["vix_close"], label="Vix", linewidth=1, color="#555555")
mins = df.index[df["min_ratio"] == 0]
ax1.vlines(mins, ymin=df["vix_close"].min(), ymax=90, color="crimson",
 linewidth=0.55, alpha=0.55, label="VixTs hits rolling 2 month min")

formatPlot(ax1, "center left")

ax2.plot(df["min_ratio"], color="#555555", linewidth=1, label="VixTs - rolling 2 month min")
formatPlot(ax2, "center left")

unknown-1

Now that the threshold is defined, one can look at the Vix returns going forward from the 2 month low being hit. Added two projected periods of 21 and 10 days to see if theres any significant difference. Average Vix returns going forward from Vix Ts hitting new 2 month lows are positive only enough so on occasions where Vix Ts itself is below 0.8 when hitting a new 2 month low

def retsShift(values, amount):
ret = (values.shift(-amount) / values) -1
return ret

df["ret21"] = retsShift(df["vix_close"], 21)
df["ret10"] = retsShift(df["vix_close"], 10)
df2 = df.copy() # Making a copy, otherwise masking will go crazy, probably doing masking wrong?
df2 = df2[df2["min_ratio"] == 0]

slope, intercept, r_val, p_val, std_err = scipy.stats.linregress(
np.array(df2["vix_ts"]), np.array(df2["ret21"]))
predict = intercept + slope * df2["vix_ts"]

plt.figure(figsize=(10, 10))
plt.plot(df2["vix_ts"], predict, "-", label="r2 = {}".format(format(r_val**2, ".2f")))
plt.scatter(df2["vix_ts"].where(df2["vix_ts"]<=0.8), df2["ret21"].where(df2["vix_ts"]<=0.8),
c="crimson", linewidth=0, s=28, alpha=0.89, label="Vix return 21 days later")
plt.scatter(df2["vix_ts"].where(df2["vix_ts"]<=0.8), df2["ret10"].where(df2["vix_ts"]<=0.8),
c="royalblue", linewidth=0, s=28, alpha=0.89, label="Vix return 10 days later")
plt.scatter(df2["vix_ts"].where(df2["vix_ts"]>0.8), df2["ret21"].where(df2["vix_ts"]>0.8),
c="#666666", linewidth=0, alpha=0.89, label=None)

plt.axhline(0, linestyle="--", color="#666666", linewidth=1)
plt.axvline(0.794, linestyle="--", color="crimson", linewidth=1, label="Vix Ts as of 25 Jan 2017")
plt.legend(loc="upper right")
plt.xlabel("Vix Ts level at which it hits a new 2 month low")
plt.ylabel("Vix return N days later")
plt.yticks(np.arange(-0.5, 1.5, 0.25))
formatPlot(plt, "upper right")

unknown

Next, looking at Vix behaviour, while filtering out only instances where Ts was below 0.8 when hitting its 2 month low.  Which is what we have in Vix Ts as of this writing

But also added mean of all instances where Ts was above 0.8

for index, row in df3.iterrows():
if row["min_ratio"] == 0 and row["vix_ts"] <= 0.8:
ret = df3["vix_close"].iloc[index:index+22]
ret = np.log(ret).diff().fillna(0)
ret = pd.Series(ret).reset_index(drop=True)
df_instances[index] = ret.cumsum()

for index, row in df3.iterrows():
if row["min_ratio"] == 0 and row["vix_ts"] > 0.8:
ret = df3["vix_close"].iloc[index:index+22]
ret = np.log(ret).diff().fillna(0)
ret = pd.Series(ret).reset_index(drop=True)
df_instances2[index] = ret.cumsum()

plt.plot(df_instances, color="#333333", alpha=0.05, linewidth=1, label=None)
plt.plot(df_instances2, color="#333333", alpha=0.05, linewidth=1, label=None)
plt.plot(df_instances.mean(axis=1), color="crimson", label="Mean Vix returns where Ts <= 0.8")
plt.plot(df_instances2.mean(axis=1), color="royalblue", label="Mean Vix returns where Ts > 0.8")
plt.axhline(0, linewidth=1, linestyle="--", color="#333333")
plt.xlabel("# Of days from Vix Ts rolling 2 month low")
plt.ylabel("Vix % return")
plt.xticks(np.arange(0, 22, 1))
plt.ylim(-0.2, 0.4)
plt.xlim(0, 21)
formatPlot(plt, "upper right")

unknown-1

However, since one can not directly trade Vix, the results are spurious, meaning when applying the signal to buy Vxx when Vix Ts hits a new 2 month low and holding it for N days (21 in the case below), the results are horrible. The reason being that Vxx (or any long volatility etf) experiences siginificant decay when Vix futures are in contango (which is most of the time in a bull market), so that holding it (just it alone) is not viable in any way. It can be useful however as a hedge in a more reasonable position sizing and allocation context

Just to make the contango effect on Vxx plain, also added backtest version which does the opposite, meaning it goes into Xiv when Vix Ts is hitting new 2 month lows and holds for 21 days

However adding the Xiv version illustrates the Vix futures contango benefits on Xiv (at least while the underlying trend in Spx is up). The backtest’s are no way anything viable, i just added them in order to gauge validity of the raw signal itself.

One could run an optimizer in order to determine the best possible Ts min trailing threshold, but i wont do that. In my limited experience, if a signal is not immediatley evident, it wont help massaging it to fit the curve

bt_vxx = get_backtest("588a07ff3d6aed61f57ca491").daily_performance.returns
bt_vxx_rets = pf.timeseries.cum_returns(bt_vxx, starting_value=1.0)

bt_xiv = get_backtest("588a069f66ba2e6145ca1aca").daily_performance.returns
bt_xiv_rets = pf.timeseries.cum_returns(bt_xiv, starting_value=1.0)

plt.figure(figsize=(16, 8))
plt.plot(bt_vxx_rets, color="royalblue", label="Strategy trading Vxx")
plt.plot(bt_xiv_rets, color="crimson", label="Strategy trading Xiv")
plt.plot((xiv.pct_change().cumsum()+1), label="Xiv b&amp;h", color="#555555")
formatPlot(plt, "center left")

unknown-5

I will look further into the underlying signal though, with a more reasonable position sizing and trade logic and will post a follow up once im somewhere with it

If anyone can pitch in regarding any mistakes, misconceptions or any other comments, please do – Thanks for your time

Discretionary trades update

Scaling out of Vix short (via long Xiv) position that i have held since election day
Also starting to scale out of Tesla long that i acquired below 200, however will just reduce position and looking to add again once it takes a breather

Have smaller open positions in
Short miners
Short biotech

Recent closed positions
Short natgas

Vix single day spikes & their historical returns

Taking a look at Vix single day spikes, since there have been two rather significant and rare single day spikes of 39 and 49% in 2016. Note, im not talking about Vix daily swings, but single day spikes from close to close. The intention here is to gauge how Vix has historically behaved after significant single day spikes

First, importing modules, vix data etc. Im running this on Quantopian so importing data is straightforward


from quantopian.interactive.data.quandl import yahoo_index_vix
from odo import odo
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
import statsmodels.api as sm
import scipy as sp

Setting up and cleaning the vix dataframe that came from quandl and adding the single day % change values

data = odo(yahoo_index_vix, pd.DataFrame)
data = data.drop(["open_", "high", "low", "adjusted_close", "volume", "timestamp"], axis = 1)
data["close"].loc[18] = 14.04 #Fixing error data
data = data.set_index(["asof_date"])

data["pct_change"] = data["close"].pct_change()
data = data.dropna()

This years second biggest spike was 39%. There have been only 12 single day spikes of 39% or greater since 1990 (again, from close to close)

len(data[data["pct_change"] &gt; 0.39])

12

When they occurred and what their actual spike percentages were

data[data["pct_change"] &gt; 0.39].sort()

screen-shot-2016-12-09-at-18-26-13

First, looking at all Vix daily percent changes as an empirical cumulative distribution, so one gets better idea how the daily percent changes are distributed. In this post, we are interested in the positive daily percent changes. As one can observe, spikes above 20% are rather rare

ecd = np.arange(1, len(data)+1, dtype=float) / len(data)
ticks = np.arange(-0.3, 1.1, 0.1)

plt.plot(np.sort(data["pct_change"]), ecd)
plt.xlabel("Vix daily percent changes (from close to close)")
plt.ylabel("Fraction of daily pct changes that are smaller than corresponding x")
plt.axvline(linestyle="--", color="#333333", linewidth=1)
plt.xticks(ticks)
plt.yticks(ticks)
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.margins(0.05)

unknown-1

We can now plot the returns N days later from a spike, iterations are for 10% and 20% spike returns 5 days later in order to have a large enough sample set. I wanted to see weither or not the spike % was correlated to the forward returns, it seems to be the case. The larger the single day spike, the more likely a negative Vix return down the road. Though it must be noted that the sample set for spikes larger than 20% is low

def pct_ret(close, amount):
rets = (close.shift(-amount) / close) - 1
return rets

ret10 = pct_ret(data["close"], 5).where(data["pct_change"] > 0.1).dropna()
pct10 = data["pct_change"][data["pct_change"] > 0.1]

ret20 = pct_ret(data["close"], 5).where(data["pct_change"] > 0.2).dropna()
pct20 = data["pct_change"][data["pct_change"] > 0.2]


slope, intercept, r_val, p_val, std_err = sp.stats.linregress(pct10, ret10)
ret10_predict = intercept + slope * pct10


plt.plot(pct10, ret10_predict, "-", label="Linreg")
plt.scatter(data["pct_change"][data["pct_change"]>0.1], ret10,
color="#333333", alpha=0.55, label="Vix spike >= 10%, return 5 days later")
plt.scatter(data["pct_change"][data["pct_change"]>0.2], ret20,
color="crimson", s=34, label="Vix spike >= 20%, return 5 days later")

plt.ylabel("Vix % return 5 days later")
plt.xlabel("Vix single day spike % (from close to close)")
plt.axhline(linestyle="--", linewidth=1, color="#333333")
plt.legend(loc="upper right")
plt.ylim(-0.5, 1)
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.title("R2={}".format(r_val**2))

 

unknown

For example, mean Vix return after a 20% single day spike or greater, 5 days later is about -16%

np.mean(ret_20[ret_20 &lt; 0])

-0.16629674607687678

For a clearer picture on how Vix actually looks like after significant spikes, we can also plot the N day returns of all instances where a significant spike occurred (in the chart below, its 64 trading days). There are notable rebound tendencies at the 10th, 20-23rd and 40th trading days after a spike. The higher spike means are more pronounced since the sample size is rather smaller on those instances

data2 = data.copy().reset_index()

def rets(df, days, pct, pct_to):
ret_df = pd.DataFrame()
for index, row in df.iterrows():
if row["pct_change"] &gt; pct and row["pct_change"] &lt; pct_to and df["pct_change"].iloc[index-1] &lt; pct:
ret = df["close"].iloc[index:index+days]
ret = np.log(ret).diff().fillna(0)
ret = pd.Series(ret).reset_index(drop=True)
ret_df[index] = ret
return ret_df

twenty = rets(data2, 65, 0.2, 0.3).mean(axis=1).cumsum()
thirty = rets(data2, 65, 0.3, 0.4).mean(axis=1).cumsum()
forty = rets(data2, 65, 0.4, 1).mean(axis=1).cumsum()

plt.plot(twenty, color="royalblue", label="Vix mean return after a spike &gt; 20% and &lt; 30%")
plt.plot(thirty, color="crimson", label="Vix mean return after a spike &gt; 30% and &lt; 40%")
plt.plot(forty, color="cadetblue", label="Vix mean return after a spike of &gt; 40%")

plt.xlabel("# Of days from spike")
plt.ylabel("Vix % return")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.ylim(-0.3, 0.1)
plt.xlim(0, 64)
plt.legend(loc="upper right")

unknown-1

The mean returns chart is desceptive, since there are of course plenty of instances where Vix just keeps going up, so one can get a better picture by looking at all the instances. In the case below, i plotted all spike instances of 20% or greater, 64 days forward

plt.plot(rets(data2, 65, 0.2, 1).cumsum(axis=0), linewidth=1, alpha=0.21, color="#333333")
plt.plot(forty, color="crimson", label="Mean")

plt.title("All instances of Vix singe day spikes &gt; 20%, returns 64 days forward")
plt.xlabel("# Of days from spike")
plt.ylabel("Vix % return")
plt.grid(alpha=0.21)
plt.axhline(0, linewidth=1, linestyle="--", color="#333333")
plt.xlim(0, 64)
plt.legend(loc="upper right")

unknown-2

One additional way of looking at the dataset is to make a heatmap of all single day spike instances, meaning we plot out all Vix single day spikes and their mean returns, regardless of the size of the spike or the direction of the spike. First converted the pct changes to integers and then grouped all the data by those. From that a heatmap of mean returns for all Vix spike % instances can be summoned

Nothing meaningful happens in the middle of the % change range, but the edges are more pronounced, however again its worth noting that the sample size on the edges is also smaller

df3 = data.copy()

for i in range(1, 35):
df3[str(i)] = pct_ret(data3["close"], i)

df3["pct_change"] = df3["pct_change"].apply(lambda x: int(round(x*100)))
df3.reset_index(inplace=True)
df3.drop(["asof_date","close"], axis=1, inplace=True)

grouped = df3.loc["1":].groupby(df3["pct_change"], as_index=True, squeeze=True).mean()
grouped.drop("pct_change", axis=1, inplace=True)

plt.figure(figsize=(16, 13))
sns.heatmap(grouped, annot=False, cmap="RdBu")
plt.ylabel("Vix single day spike %")
plt.xlabel("Number of days after spike")
plt.title("Vix single day % spikes vs. mean returns N days later")

unknown-3

If anyone can pitch in regarding any mistakes, misconceptions or any other comments, please do – Thanks for your time